Urban data: Harnessing subjective sociocultural data from local newspapers

Rose, F M and Chang, J (2023) Urban data: Harnessing subjective sociocultural data from local newspapers. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 369-385. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

As data-based governance becomes mainstream, social and cultural interactions that characterise urban life are at risk of being ignored in decision-making practices if only supposedly objective, quantifiable data are used. In this context, this article conceptualises subjective sociocultural data as a data form that considers a city’s intangible and unquantifiable social and cultural aspects. A methodology is proposed for collecting and using subjective sociocultural data by highlighting local press articles as a potential data source. A pilot application conducted in Hamburg, Germany, demonstrates a potential integration of subjective sociocultural data into urban planning processes by analysing over 2500 local newspaper articles. The findings reveal that local journalism can be a data source for understanding diverse social and cultural interactions between citizens and urban places. This street-level information from local newspaper articles can (1) provide urban planners with an overview of newspaper mentions of any specific urban areas, (2) support the identification of local debates, and (3) aid in the observation of emerging places of sociocultural interactions. This approach can support the diverse government and non-government stakeholders engaged in data-based governance to better account for intangible sociocultural aspects of urban life.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cities; data politics; data-based governance; datafication; local journalism; planning; sociocultural data; subjective data; urban data; urban governance
Index terms: newspaper, politics, urban governance, governance, interaction, urban planning, integration, urban area, decision-making, methodology, Germany, planner
Subjects: urban planning, business, profession, decision analysis, sociology, organizational analysis, behavioral psychology, political science, research methods, urban form and morphology, Geography
Topics: Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Governance, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here