Achieving deep-energy retrofits for households in energy poverty

Tozer, L; Macrae, H and Smit, E (2023) Achieving deep-energy retrofits for households in energy poverty. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 258-273. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Climate change and energy poverty are two sustainability challenges that can be addressed through deep-energy retrofits for homes. This systematic review identifies which factors influence the achievement of energy retrofits for households vulnerable to energy poverty. It covers both energy-poor households and the landlords or building owners of energy-poor households. The results identify a range of influential factors across several themes: financial, policy and organizational, trust and communication, technical, attitudes and values, and health. Health and quality of life are particularly influential motivating factors among households vulnerable to energy poverty, as is the presence of trust and communication between stakeholders. Multiple financial considerations are also important, such as the availability of no-cost retrofit options and the prospect of lower energy and maintenance costs. Lastly, government requirements to retrofit and minimum energy standards are motivating, particularly in the social housing sector. These findings and the lack of focus on energy poverty within the energy retrofit literature and policies point to a need for further research on this topic, and for retrofit policies specifically targeted to households vulnerable to energy poverty.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dwellings; energy poverty; fuel poverty; housing; public health; public policy; residential buildings; retrofit
Index terms: residential building, climate change, fuel poverty, option, poverty, public policy, maintenance cost, social housing, influential factor, sustainability challenge, systematic literature review, owner, landlord, household, quality of life, public health, housing, presence
Subjects: public and environmental health, housing and residential development, research evaluation and metrics, decision analysis, environmental science, construction type, demography, environmental health, environmental issues, climate science, energy systems, risk assessment, financial management, public policy, sociology
Topics: Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Ethics, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here