Improving social value through facilities management: Swedish housing companies

Troje, D (2023) Improving social value through facilities management: Swedish housing companies. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 749-766. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Housing companies create, maintain and develop an important part of the built environment. Besides their core activity of providing housing, they can increasingly also mitigate societal problems and contribute to social, environmental and financial sustainability. One contribution to sustainability by housing companies is to create meaningful activities for tenants that benefit their employability, skills, careers, and physical and mental wellbeing. These 'activity interventions' are used as a vehicle to create social value. However, it is unclear what sort of impact these interventions have, and how they affect housing companies' financial value. This paper investigates: (1) Swedish housing companies' initiatives to provide meaningful 'activity interventions' for tenants; (2) what value these interventions create; and (3) how social value creation relates to financial value. Observations and interviews (n = 23) with Swedish housing companies are mapped onto a social value creation framework. The findings reveal several types of employment, educational and leisure activities that have been created for tenants, and the areas in which these initiatives create the most social value. Social value creation is often used as risk management to mitigate issues related to criminality, welfare-dependent tenants and decreased property values.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: criminality; education; employment; facilities management; housing; social value; Sweden; tenants; wellbeing
Index terms: employability, interview, property value, Sweden, employment, tenant, social value, risk management, built environment, well-being, career, housing, facilities management
Subjects: management, Geography, professional development, sociology, human resources and leadership, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment, mental health and wellbeing, practitioner, real estate economics
Topics: Education, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here