Disruptive data: Historicising the platformisation of Dublin's taxi industry

White, J and Larsson, S (2023) Disruptive data: Historicising the platformisation of Dublin's taxi industry. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), pp. 838-850. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Social and economic change in the built environment is increasingly driven by processes of datafication. These often find expression through smart phone apps and private platforms that seek to upset the status quo by mediating consumer and producer interactions, and by monetising the data these produce. This paper uses the practice-oriented concept of 'disruptive data' to draw attention away from specific technologies and towards the broader political economic logics that underlie them. In so doing, disruption is reframed as a capitalist strategy for creating and capitalising on uncertainty. The rapid change to Dublin’s taxi industry over the past decade illustrates these dynamics. By following how ride-hailing apps, most notably Hailo, were introduced into and effected the city, the importance of regulatory context but also wider flows of data and capital are stressed. Data disruptions occur not at the level of the app or platform, but at the economic relations in which they are embedded. By paying attention to the historical details of data disruption, the specificities of change processes are revealed without losing track of their broader economic function.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: data politics; digital platform; disruptive data; dublin; mobility services; ride-hailing app; smart city; taxi; urban transport
Index terms: dynamics, platform, interaction, politics, smart city, mobility, strategy, built environment
Subjects: political science, urban sustainability, systems engineering, digital design, behavioral psychology, management, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance
Descriptive scope: 1 C

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here