Christensen, T H; Aagaard, L K; Juvik, A K; Samson, C and Gram-Hanssen, K (2024) Promoting practices of sufficiency: Reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 629-644. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
There is an urgent need to change everyday practices in less resource-intensive directions. However, present practices unfold within existing material infrastructures and social institutions established during times of fossil fuel abundance. While acknowledging that a transition to sufficiency will require material and institutional transformations, it is also evident that major changes in material arrangements can be highly resource demanding. Thus, the adoption of less resource-intensive everyday practices must take place within present material arrangements that are modified with the least possible material use. This paper explores theoretically the possible pathways for sufficiency-based everyday practices within existing, slightly modified materialities. It develops the concept of ‘reprogramming’, i.e. to promote sufficiency through performing practices in different ways within existing or slightly modified material arrangements, and it explores how changes in institutional arrangements further can promote such resource-light practices. Based on discussions of sufficiency, practice theories and social metabolism, the concept of reprogramming is exemplified through empirical findings, particularly focusing on mobility practices in young adults (n = 31). Possible reprogramming strategies are presented that promote sufficiency-based practices within existing resource-intensive materialities and institutions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cities; consumption; everyday practices; lifestyles; materiality; mobility; practice theory; reprogramming; social practices; sufficiency; urban planning |
| Index terms: | social practice, materiality, consumption, fossil fuel, practice theory, lifestyle, mobility, strategy, urban planning, transformation |
| Subjects: | energy systems, demography, urban planning, sociology, social theory, business, infrastructure and transport systems, theoretical framing, consumer economics, management |
| Topics: | Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here