Denham, T; Rickards, L and Ajulo, O (2024) The jobs of climate adaptation. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 283-299. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
As climate change impacts human systems, associated adaptation efforts are beginning to shape the quality of life in cities and other places. How the work of climate change adaptation is being undertaken, by whom, where and for whose benefit, has important justice and equity outcomes. Increasingly, adaptation work is being formalised into paid jobs. This emerging field of work has been rarely studied, but it is important to understand because the disciplinary backgrounds, organisational positions, roles, responsibilities and spatial locations involved are likely to have a disproportionate influence on wider approaches to climate change risk and adaptation, including societal understandings of what actually is climate change adaptation. This paper commences the investigation into paid adaptation work by analysing Australian job advertisements for adaptation roles, and interviewing associated hiring managers. It identifies three biases in the jobs of adaptation on offer towards: well-resourced and urban-based positions; professional services; and a climate risk management interpretation of adaptation. These biases indicate that urban adaptation has the potential to ossify, if not exacerbate, unjust urban geographies. To help moderate this risk of maladaptation, investment is required into other forms of adaptation work, particularly within the public sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; built environment; cities; climate adaptation; climate professionals; consultant services; professional services; public sector; social justice |
| Index terms: | professional service, bias, climate adaptation, built environment, investigation, urban geography, climate risk, climate change, manager, justice, social justice, quality of life, adaptation, Australia, public sector |
| Subjects: | legal systems, organization, user focus, data collection methods, climate science, practitioner, sociology, environmental hazards, administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, public and environmental health, probability and distributions, Geography |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Ethics, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here