Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: Did much change?

Hollick, F; Humphrey, D; Oreszczyn, T; Elwell, C and Huebner, G (2024) Building energy use in COVID-19 lockdowns: Did much change? Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 182-198. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

The lockdowns introduced to prevent the spread of COVID-19 had huge impacts, as people were largely confined to their homes. It could be expected that residential energy use would increase while non-residential decreased, however the picture is not so clear. Here three complementary datasets on different scales are used to explore changes in building energy use during two UK lockdowns: the complete building stock of Great Britain, a sample of approximately 1000 residential buildings, and one of about 24,000 residential boilers. Energy-signature analysis was used for the building data to estimate the changes in demand for space heating and other uses, with the boiler data able to separate space and water heating and explore changes in these. In the 2020 lockdown residential energy consumption for water heating and appliances increased, with decreased use for space heating, resulting in a reduction in total energy use during the heating season. In the 2021 lockdown total energy consumption changed little, however a decrease in the use of gas space heating was observed. The residential changes counteracted non-domestic changes, resulting in little difference in national energy consumption. These results highlight how longitudinal datasets enabled by Internet of Things-enabled devices can be crucial as an evidence base for research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; COVID-19; energy data; energy demand; energy epidemiology; heating; homes; lockdown; UK; working from home
Index terms: building stock, residential energy, energy epidemiology, energy demand, building energy use, residential building, COVID-19, dataset, consumption, estimate, internet, energy use, space heating, evidence, energy consumption
Subjects: health risk and incident analysis, asset management, data management, mechanical systems, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, computing systems, consumer economics, sustainability and energy, financial and cost management, energy systems
Topics: Digital Applications, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here