Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets

Hvid Horup, L; Ohms, P K; Hauschild, M; Gummidi, S R B; Secher, A Q; Thuesen, C and Ryberg, M (2024) Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 117-132. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

With the growing urgency of addressing climate change it is increasingly important that decision makers at all levels are equipped to take efficient mitigation actions. This research evaluates the potential of four mitigation strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the building stock based on a case study, and these are further evaluated in terms of alignment with the remaining global emission budget and the planetary boundary for global warming. The results cover annual emissions from 2023 to 2050 across 18 impact categories, thus highlighting possible impact burden-shifting that may occur as a result of the mitigation strategies. The results show that decarbonisation of the electricity grid delivers a substantial reduction across impact categories. However, in absolute terms, this is counteracted by the increase in building stock. The results also show that current estimates for mitigation potentials are insufficient to comply with the remaining global emission budget. Thus, mitigation strategies should be even more ambitious: constructing 80% fewer new buildings and reducing operational energy demand by 80%. These findings highlight the urgency of taking multiple actions. The increase in demand for new buildings needs to be challenged.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; built environment; carbon budget; decision support; dynamic modelling; life cycle assessment; urban planning; case study
Index terms: global warming, mitigation, decision support, life cycle assessment, strategy, estimate, climate change, built environment, energy demand, urban planning, greenhouse gas emission, dynamic modelling, case study, building stock
Subjects: financial risk, management, decision analysis, data collection methods, environmental impact, modelling and simulation, environmental health, climate science, infrastructure and transport systems, asset management, urban planning, energy systems, financial and cost management
Topics: Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Governance, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here