Finnish glazed balconies: Residents’ experience, wellbeing and use

Jegard, L; Castaño-Rosa, R; Kilpeläinen, S and Pelsmakers, S (2024) Finnish glazed balconies: Residents’ experience, wellbeing and use. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 540-561. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Amidst sustainability challenges and in an increasingly urbanised context, housing design qualities are crucial to promote residents’ wellbeing. Despite the role balconies play in establishing connections with the surrounding environment and enhancing housing qualities, questions around how to design balconies that meet users’ needs remain under-characterised. An online survey and analysis of Finnish residents’ (n = 393) attitudes to and uses of their balconies is presented. This provides improved insights into and understanding of the implications of glazed balcony design on housing qualities and users’ wellbeing. The subjective data are analysed in three steps via summary statistics, content analysis and co-occurrence analysis. Results reveal that balconies are greatly used, and that glazed enclosures of balconies—a specific characteristic in Finland— enhance the balconies’ space functionality throughout the year. However, glazed balconies are perceived to be potentially harmful to overall indoor environmental quality, increasing overheating risk, and reducing daylight and purge ventilation in the living space if not used as designed. This study shows the need for a user-oriented approach to design balconies that enhance housing qualities and users’ wellbeing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: balconies; dwelling; Finland; glazing; housing; inhabitants; resident experience; spatial use; sustainability; wellbeing
Index terms: statistics, housing, well-being, indoor environmental quality, functionality, overheating, Finland, content analysis, glazing, ventilation, survey, sustainability challenge, enclosure, housing design quality
Subjects: professional practice, data analysis and analytics, design features, environmental issues, data collection methods, construction type, air quality, mathematical modelling, mental health and wellbeing, environmental health, thermal systems, Geography, architectural elements
Topics: Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here