Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites

Koch, M; Emilsson, K; Lee, J and Johansson, H (2024) Structural barriers to sufficiency: the contribution of research on elites. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 268-282. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

'Sufficiency' has become a key term within sustainability science. The satisfaction of basic human needs for all and for multiple generations is only possible if coupled to the implementation of ecological ceilings that prevent wealthy groups from disproportionate production and consumption patterns and energy use. While much sufficiency research has focused on the poor and how to provide corresponding social floors (i.e. an adequate level of sufficiency), this conceptual paper theorises structural barriers to implementing ecological ceilings for production and consumption by considering research on elites. The argument is illustrated with examples from urban spaces that are increasingly structured to accommodate the preferences of economic elites. A better scholarly understanding of the structural barriers to sufficiency dissemination can be facilitated through a systematic account of the political, social and symbolic strategies deployed by elites to accumulate and legitimise power. Conversely, a consideration of sufficiency principles would also be beneficial for research on elites, which has so far focused on social inequality and sidelined the ecological crisis. The discussion highlights how research on sufficiency and elite consumption may interact to be mutually beneficial. A research agenda is proposed to understand economic elites as barriers to the dissemination of sufficiency principles.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; climate emergency; ecological limits; economic elites; energy demand; inequality; lifestyles; overconsumption; socio-ecological transformation; sufficiency; sustainable welfare
Index terms: urban space, dissemination, inequality, built environment, consumption, implementation, preference, energy use, research agenda, satisfaction, energy demand, strategy, science, lifestyle, transformation
Subjects: demography, sociology, research management, infrastructure and transport systems, management, decision-making and reasoning, urban design and public space, knowledge translation, energy systems, contractual arrangements, project delivery, business, consumer economics, specialized education
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Urban Studies, Education
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here