IAQ and environmental health literacy: Lived experiences of vulnerable people

Smith, C; Drinkwater, A; Modlich, M; Horst, D V D and Doherty, R (2024) IAQ and environmental health literacy: Lived experiences of vulnerable people. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 231-246. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Like other environmental concerns that affect human health, indoor air quality (IAQ) needs to be understood not only scientifically but also by the citizens who are affected by it. Six online focus groups sessions were conducted with people living in London who could be considered particularly vulnerable to air pollution exposure, namely older people, parents with young children and people with underlying health conditions. Each session involved an iterative process of group discussion, information provision and reflection/further discussion. A deductive thematic analysis guided by an environmental health literacy (EHL) lens was used to explore participants' awareness of, and lived experience with, IAQ. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the EHL of vulnerable people, whilst also suggesting that learning more about IAQ (given the participants' low level of prior knowledge) can be effective in increasing people’s willingness to make behavioural changes in indoor contexts. Several practical measures could be taken by various stakeholders to reduce residents' exposure, especially those who have limited agency due to vulnerability (e.g. reduced mobility) or other personal circumstances (e.g. residing in a rental property).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agency; air pollution exposure; environmental health; health inequalities; health literacy; indoor air pollution; inhabitants; respiratory health; ventilation; vulnerability; focus group
Index terms: vulnerability, thematic analysis, reflection, London, indoor air quality, inequality, older people, indoor air pollution, agency, exposure, focus group, low level, mobility, human health, behavioural change, air pollution, ventilation, children, environmental health, environmental concern
Subjects: methods and analysis, Geography, professional development, public and environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, behavioral psychology, environmental health, demography, sociology, measurement and scaling, environmental issues, climate science, data collection methods, air quality
Topics: Sustainability, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Ethics, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here