Applying just-in-time principles in the delivery and management of airport terminal buildings

Pheng, L S; Arain, F M and Fang, J W Y (2011) Applying just-in-time principles in the delivery and management of airport terminal buildings. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 1(1), pp. 104-121. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine how the just-in-time (JIT) principles can be adopted for the air travel industry with specific emphasis on the management and operations of terminal buildings in airports. Design/methodology/approach: Three methods were adopted for the empirical part of this study. These included the observational walk-through, interviews and survey questionnaires conducted in the Changi International Airport in Singapore. The evaluation for JIT application, as part of a larger study, includes the points of arrival and departure, the check-in hall, immigration area, transit mall, gate lounges, food and beverage outlets, retail shops as well as other management initiatives that strive for continuous improvement. This paper focuses only on the check-in hall. Findings: Japanese businesses have been able to compete successfully in the world market in recent decades because of their total dedication to quality and productivity issues. This has been made possible in part by the guiding principles of the JIT concept which many Japanese businesses subscribed to. The JIT principles include waste elimination, pull production system, uninterrupted work flow, total quality control, top management commitment, employee involvement, long term working relationships with suppliers and continuous improvement. The JIT concept was specifically examined in this study in the context of the Changi International Airport through its planning processes and existing operations. The study was able to highlight the strengths as well as areas for potential improvements in the airport through the application of the seven JIT principles. Practical implications: Beyond Japanese businesses, the JIT concept was also found to have benefited organizations in a wide range of industries including those relating to the built environment. The study covers major processes and procedures typical of the spatial management and operations of major airport terminal buildings which holds promising lessons for airport management worldwide. Originality/value: The analysis shows significant potential in applying JIT principles for managing airport operations within the confines of the physical airport terminal buildings. It recommends that designers, project managers and asset managers should progress beyond the traditional "design follows functions" approach to adopt the more integrative "design follows JIT-driven functions" approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: airports; built environment; design and development; just-in-time; management; Singapore
Index terms: designer, survey, continuous improvement, productivity, commitment, project manager, design and development, planning process, interview, employee involvement, Singapore, manager, quality control, just-in-time, questionnaire, pull production, built environment, top management, methodology
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, practitioner, psychology, project delivery, performance measurement, management, research methods, Geography, design process, project controls, lean logistics, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Time Control, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here