Raphael, B (2011) Multi-criteria decision making for collaborative design optimization of buildings. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 1(2), pp. 122-136. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to improve current design processes by proposing a new approach based on multi-criteria optimization of the designed asset. Management of design in construction projects is a complex task since it involves collaboration between professionals in multiple disciplines. Traditionally, designers work with a single solution at a time which is iteratively modified according to the view points of all the consultants. This results in sub-optimal solutions. A multi-criteria approach is able to accommodate diverse view points of specialist consultants in a construction project, aiming at a better optimized building system. Design/methodology/approach: The shortcomings of current design practices are analyzed based on a literature review. It is found that current approaches involving single objective optimization or Pareto optimization are not adequate for supporting collaborative design processes. A new approach to managing multiple objectives in design is proposed. This involves performing multi-objective optimization, presenting a population of good solutions to the design consultants and selecting the best solution through an algorithm called RR-PARETO2 (Relaxed-Restricted Pareto) filtering. A software tool with a graphical user interface was developed. An example of the design of a building façade is taken to evaluate the application of this approach. Findings: The paper provides empirical evidence that a multi-objective optimization approach is able to provide support for the task of accommodating multiple viewpoints in design. The proposed methodology allows navigation through the solution space and pruning it visually by applying constraints. It is shown that the RR-PARETO2 is able to select a good compromise solution with the best trade-offs among all the objectives. Originality/value: The idea of visualizing and filtering a population of design solutions has been proposed by design researchers for a long time, but is not currently adopted in practice in construction projects. The idea of collaborative filtering of the solution space according to the viewpoints of all the consultants by visually applying constraints on design variables and objectives is a new concept, the ultimate aim being a better balanced built asset. This is the first time the RR-PARETO2 algorithm has been applied to building design.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; conflict management; construction industry; decision support systems; design management; optimization; pareto analysis; programming and algorithm theory; structural design |
| Index terms: | designer, literature review, user interface, decision support, pareto analysis, design process, building design, conflict management, design practice, structural design, built asset, collaborative design, specialist consultant, construction industry, programming, evidence, multi-objective optimization, population, construction project, collaboration, design management, building system, decision-making, methodology |
| Subjects: | quality control, architectural design, data analysis and analytics, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, architectural engineering, practitioner, design methods, engineering systems, programming, asset management, decision analysis, demography, conflict resolution, human-computer interaction, industry analysis, research methods, algorithms, management, design process, production management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here