Quality control analysis of downtime and time to repair for water supply pipes

Singh, A; Adachi, S and Inouye, M (2011) Quality control analysis of downtime and time to repair for water supply pipes. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 1(1), pp. 75-90. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate performance times from a quality engineering perspective for response and repair of pipes at a public utility. The objective is to scientifically determine the pipe that offers the most desirable downtime (DT) and time to repair (TTR). Design/methodology/approach: Four types of water supply pipes - concrete cylinder (CC), cast iron (CI), ductile iron (DI), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) - in prevalent use at the City and County of Honolulu Board of Water Supply were analyzed to determine the pipe type that is most consistently repaired to desired performance specifications. Data for mean downtime (MDT) and mean time to repair (MTTR) were used to evaluate the stability and capability of the repair processes for each pipe type. The analysis was completed through the use of control charts, operating characteristic (OC) curves, and process capability indices. Findings: The results of the analysis indicated that CI pipes were the worst material in terms of DT and TTR. The control charts for MDT for all pipe types, and the MTTR for CI and CC pipes, were found to be out of statistical control, but the control charts for the MTTR of DI and PVC pipes were discovered to be in control. According to the OC curves, in which the hypothesis stated that the average MDT or MTTR was between the specification limits, there was a high tendency in all pipe types to accept the hypothesis when it was true. However, the probability of type I errors was high from operational standards at the USL level. Process capability analyses found that only CC pipes were able to meet performance design specifications; however, repair times are extremely large for CC pipes. Overall, it is recommended that CI pipes be replaced when the opportunity arises. Practical implications: This investigation serves to address a major query in asset management at the public utility, that of which pipes should be selected during design and procurement from a maintenance perspective. In addition, the study helps to understand the trend of DT and TTR for the various pipes. Social implications: Quality water supply is of paramount social importance in modern cities. Originality/value: A quality engineering approach to asset management for pipe systems at public utilities that serves to add a new dimension to asset performance analysis is adopted.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: control charts; downtime; operating characteristic curves; process analysis; quality control; time to repair; United States of America; water supply
Index terms: investigation, performance analysis, performance specification, design specification, process analysis, methodology, dimension, quality control, repair, specification, water supply, United States of America, public utility, stability, asset management
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, asset management, infrastructure and transport systems, management, design practice, structural engineering, research methods, maintenance engineering, tendering, Geography, contractual condition
Topics: Contract Administration, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Procurement, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here