Learning through briefing: For strategic facilities management in the health sector

Loosemore, M and Chandra, V (2012) Learning through briefing: For strategic facilities management in the health sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(1), pp. 103-117. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the process of cultural learning during the briefing process, to enable facilities managers to move into more strategic roles in the health sector. Design/methodology/approach: Using a new hospital as an in depth case study the authors use comparative cause mapping to illustrate the cultural learning processes between actors in the briefing process. Findings: The focus during the briefing process is primarily on the mechanical transfer of explicit technical knowledge about building requirements rather than the cognitive learning of tacit cultural knowledge. This results in the omission of important strategic information in the briefing process. Research limitations/implications: This research is limited to a single case study. Although this results in a high level of validity, more research is needed in other contexts to test the generalisability of the findings. Practical implications: The new strategic model produced should help facility managers reconceptualise briefing as a cyclical process where project actors can arrive at a shared meaning of each other's values, beliefs and needs over time. Social implications: More effective hospital facilities can significantly contribute to better health outcomes in communities. Originality/value: This is the first time that briefing has been explored using cognitive cause mapping. It is also the first time that cultural learning has been explored in this context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: briefing; cause mapping; culture; facilities management; health services sector; hospitals; information exchange; learning; project management; team briefings
Index terms: methodology, mapping, facilities manager, hospital facility, facilities management, briefing, project management, manager, case study, health services sector, meaning, information exchange, validity
Subjects: industry analysis, sociology, project management theory and practice, management, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, data science, scope management, practitioner, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here