System-of-systems approach for assessment of financial innovations in infrastructure

Mostafavi, A; Abraham, D M and Lee, J (2012) System-of-systems approach for assessment of financial innovations in infrastructure. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(2), pp. 250-265. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study presented in this paper is to assess determinants of financial innovations in infrastructure using a system-of-systems approach, and to demonstrate this approach in the context of the US highway transportation sector. Design/methodology/approach: A system-of-systems approach is adopted for systemic assessment. Data obtained from a case-based research approach and a survey deployed to the state Departments of Transportation in the US is utilized in parallel with a network analysis to explore the status quo, key players and interactions, and the drivers of financial innovations for infrastructure. Findings: The findings include constructs regarding the players, practices, and activities and also a conceptual model relating to the drivers of financial innovations. Practical implications: The model along with the constructs provides an analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of financial innovations. Such understanding would lead to expansion of the creation and diffusion of financial innovation practices in the highway transportation infrastructure globally. Originality/value: The study presented in this paper is the first of its kind to identify the determinants of financial innovations in infrastructure based on a systemic approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: finance; innovation; innovative financing; policy; system-of-systems analysis; transportation infrastructure
Index terms: survey, transportation sector, network analysis, system-of-systems, determinant, interaction, transportation infrastructure, methodology, innovative financing, dynamics
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, data collection methods, risk assessment, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, research methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here