Olanrewaju, A A L (2012) Quantitative analysis of defects in university buildings: User perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(2), pp. 167-181. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Defect management is an important segment in building maintenance management. Although defect management requires systemic approach, the purpose of this paper is to focus on the measurement of defects in university buildings based on user perspective. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviews related literature and presents the outcome of a survey of 550 university buildings users, derived from a convenience sample from five universities. Findings: A total of 20 defects were found to be very critical to the building users. Faulty electrical systems, faulty air conditioning system and roof damages were the defects requiring urgent maintenance. Based on the findings, it was concluded that resources be directed towards defects that affect security, safety and comfort. Research limitations/implications: The list of 32 defects may not be exhaustive, but are indicative of defects that affect university building performance. Because the buildings are not prototypes, some of the findings required adaptation. The conclusions were based on data from five universities. Practical implications: This study is useful to maintenance organizations in efforts to increase users' satisfaction, productivity and building performance by guiding resources allocation and at the same time reducing rework, dissatisfaction and waste. The findings would provide feedback and feed forward information and knowledge to the design and construction teams. The study provides a platform to integrate maintenance issues into the design and construction phases of building projects. Originality/value: There is no such conclusive study on the maintenance of university buildings. Both academics and practitioners can apply the findings to their respective maintenance management scenarios.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; defects; maintenance; Malaysia; university buildings |
| Index terms: | design and construction, practitioner, comfort, methodology, defect management, air conditioning, roof, quantitative analysis, platform, building maintenance, satisfaction, feed forward, Malaysia, maintenance management, damages, user perspective, survey, adaptation, productivity, building performance, prototype, rework |
| Subjects: | user focus, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner, dispute resolution, control systems, modelling and simulation, operations management, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, maintenance engineering, research methods, design practice, management, digital design, Geography, occupational health and safety management, environmental engineering, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here