Tjandra, K D; Irawan, F G; Nugraha, P and Sunindijo, R Y (2022) Drone readiness in the Indonesian construction industry. Construction Economics and Building, 22(4), pp. 36-58. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Despite being perceived as a traditional industry, the construction industry is slowly being ushered into the Construction 4.0 era. Drone technology is seen as a disruptive, game-changing technology that has the potential to improve performance across all construction phases. However, despite the size of the country and its rapidly growing construction industry, research on drone technology in the Indonesian construction industry is limited. This research, therefore, aims to assess the drone readiness of construction practitioners in Indonesia and use the findings to recommend ways to promote its use. Readiness in this research is reflected by levels of understanding, utilisation, and interest in drone technology, as well as barriers to using drones at work. Data collected using a questionnaire survey from Surabaya, the second largest city in the country, reveal that, despite the relatively high level of interest, levels of understanding and utilisation are low. Furthermore, the lack of skilled human resources, risks associated with using drones, high costs, and limited information about drone suppliers are barriers that hinder the adoption of this technology in the Indonesian construction industry. This study fills the gap in the current research on the use of drone technology in the construction industry and provides a basis for practitioners or researchers to promote the application of the technology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Indonesia; questionnaire survey; construction phase; suppliers |
| Index terms: | construction phase, construction industry, questionnaire, practitioner, human resource, construction practitioner, survey, drone, construction 4.0, Indonesia |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, Geography, automation and robotics, professional development, management, project delivery, practitioner, data collection methods, digital engineering |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here