Eadie, R; Millar, P and Grant, R (2013) PFI/PPP, private sector perspectives of UK transport and healthcare. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(1), pp. 89-104. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Public private partnerships (PPP) and the private finance initiative (PFI) are defined as a range of practical long-standing relationships between the public and private sectors. This paper aims to investigate managers' perceptions of PPP/PFI in two of the three largest sectors for private sector capital-spend in PPP/PFI schemes, namely transport (highway infrastructure) and healthcare. Design/methodology/approach: A web-based Limesurvey™ questionnaire was used to collect data. A sample of 75 organisations was identified from the Partnerships UK (PUK) online Project Database (Partnerships UK, 2010). Total of 49 responses were received, of which 39 were complete. Findings: Results from each sector relating to PPP/PFI "best value", advantages and disadvantages, and government preferred procurement routes, are investigated. The majority of organisations did not consider that PPP/PFI provided "best value" but thought it provided more value than the other two UK Government preferred procurement routes, "design and build" and "prime contracting". Practical implications: This questions the UK Government's choice of preferred procurement routes. However, even during a recession and its aftermath, the majority of respondents consider that PPP/PFI remains appropriate to healthcare and transport developments. Originality/value: Firstly, this paper carries out a ranking of common advantages and disadvantages to PFI/PPP followed by an investigation of "best value" as perceived by contractors and consultants subsequent to the construction phase. Then the three preferred UK Government procurement routes are contrasted in terms of "best value" and finally the paper investigates how PPP/PFI schemes are viewed during recessionary times.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best value; private finance initiative; procurement; procurement routes; public-private partnerships; recession |
| Index terms: | private sector, partnership, database, government procurement, recession, manager, highway infrastructure, construction phase, design and build, public private partnership, private finance initiative, methodology, best value, investigation, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, procurement strategy, partnership management, data management, research methods, civil engineering, bidding, contractual arrangements, project delivery, economic analysis, practitioner, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here