A PPP renegotiation framework: A road concession in Greece

Nikolaidis, N and Roumboutsos, A (2013) A PPP renegotiation framework: A road concession in Greece. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(2), pp. 264-278. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a framework approach to guide the identification of potential public private partnership (PPP) renegotiation outcomes is presented. The framework is applied to a road concession project under renegotiation in Greece. Design/methodology/approach: The framework combines the estimation of stakeholder payoffs with respect to the various strategic options available. Their potential acceptance is evaluated with respect to the power distribution within the stakeholder network. The contextual environment determines the respective power position of each stakeholder in the network. Findings: The proposed framework is applied to a road concession case in Greece, under renegotiation as a result of the economic crisis. The analysis highlights the importance of the contextual environment and the limitations of solutions that seem "satisfying" for all stakeholders involved. Social implications: The framework is designed to guide both public and private parties involved in the renegotiation processes in identifying potential solutions or the inability to reach outcomes under specific contextual environments. Assessments are made based on expert knowledge rather than data collection, which is impossible during the renegotiation phase. The application proposed process limit renegotiation transaction costs. Originality/value: The renegotiation framework based on stakeholder payoffs and power theory, is an approach especially useful for complex contract renegotiations, where multiple stakeholders influence the final outcome. The importance of the contextual environment is highlighted. In addition, the paper contributes to the empirical renegotiation literature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concessions; Greece; mitigation strategies; power distribution; renegotiation; stakeholders
Index terms: transaction cost, estimation, Greece, strategy, stakeholder network, mitigation, methodology, public private partnership, option
Subjects: financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, participation process, decision analysis, financial analysis, research methods, management, financial risk, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here