Real option theory for risk mitigation in transport PPPs

Pellegrino, R; Vajdic, N and Carbonara, N (2013) Real option theory for risk mitigation in transport PPPs. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(2), pp. 199-213. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) require the analysis and allocation of a broad spectrum of risks which are considered more complex than in traditional construction contracts. Traditional risk management techniques tend to ignore the manager's ability to recognize and exploit opportunities, which arise as uncertainties are resolved over time and which could potentially increase the project's value. Therefore it is necessary that the risk management process takes account of the managerial flexibility (e.g. real options). The objective of this paper is to explore the possibilities and rationale for implementing real options strategies in the risk management process. Design/methodology/approach: The approach is based on a literature analysis aimed at identifying key risks and related mitigation strategies and on real option theory in order to model these strategies as managerial flexibilities that naturally exist or are built "artificially" in contractual conditions and clauses, guarantees, etc. Findings: The paper develops an option-based risk management framework that associates to each risk the related mitigation strategies, which are expressed in terms of real options. The latter is expressed over the project phases conditioned to the natural evolution of risks over time. Originality/value: This paper proposes a new "dynamic" risk management approach for PPP projects based on real options that improves the traditional risk management techniques by supporting the decision makers in finding a cost-effective combination of real options (or forms of flexibility) to embed in a PPP investment in order to optimally control risk and maximize investment value.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: mitigation strategies; PPP; real options; risk analysis; risk management
Index terms: option, risk analysis, real option, risk mitigation, risk management, mitigation, evolution, methodology, strategy, partnership, traditional construction, guarantee, manager
Subjects: environmental science, economic analysis, practitioner, risk assessment, heritage and conservation, environmental hazards, partnership management, decision analysis, financial risk, management, contract structure, research methods
Topics: Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here