Could refurbishment of "traditional" buildings reducecarbon emissions?

Atkins, R and Emmanuel, R (2014) Could refurbishment of "traditional" buildings reducecarbon emissions? Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(3), pp. 221-237. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose – Evaluate the post occupancy performance of a typical “traditional” building using multiple post occupancy evaluation (PoE) protocols against design intents to learn lessons about theirsuitability in meeting UK’s climate change reduction targets. The paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approach – PoE studies of a single case study, Norton Park, using three PoEmethodologies. Gaps and overlaps between the PoE protocols are assessed and their role in improving energy and carbon emission performance of traditional buildings is explored.Findings – Refurbishment of the type undertaken in this case study could halve the energy use in traditional buildings with comparable savings in CO2 emission.Research limitations/implications – Traditional buildings could positively contribute toachieving climate change reduction targets; regular feedback loops improve performance over time.Practical implications – Quantification of the likely national benefit of focusing retrofit actions on traditional buildings is explored.Originality/value – The research study demonstrates that very high levels of energy saving can be achieved when traditional buildings are refurbished. In addition on-going monitoring and PoE studieshighlight opportunities to optimise the performance of traditional buildings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: comfort; energy efficiency; poe; post occupancy evaluation; refurbishment; traditional buildings
Index terms: energy efficiency, quantification, carbon emission, case study, post-occupancy evaluation, savings, energy-saving, monitoring, traditional building, methodology, feedback loop, comfort, energy use, climate change
Subjects: research methods, measurement and scaling, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, construction type, climate science, control systems, sustainability and energy, economic analysis, evaluation methods, energy systems
Topics: Quality Management, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here