Industrial innovation: Case study of the Claerwen Dam

Holt, G D (2014) Industrial innovation: Case study of the Claerwen Dam. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(2), pp. 146-165. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: Societal needs produce infrastructural demands that often, require innovative industrial solutions to optimally satisfy them. One such need is fresh clean water and this has been met in part, by a global infrastructure of dams and reservoirs. Dams have borne witness to their innovative construction design, technology and management (CDTM) over the years and the purpose of this paper is to examine an example of this, relating to Claerwen dam in Great Britain. Design/methodology/approach: The study used historical case study method based on Busha and Harter's (1980) model, to accommodate synthesis of extant, historical and archive data. Subsequent archival data analysis is founded predominately on document synthesis and embraces a longitudinal character. Findings: Benefiting incontrovertibly from industrial innovations, Claerwen was constructed in markedly different ways from its "sister" phase 1 Elan Valley dams built 50 years earlier, to uniquely combine vernacular aesthetic with contemporary CDTM of the time and create a reservoir with capacity almost equal to that of the entire phase 1 dams combined. Research limitations/implications: Findings offset a dearth of historical construction research more generally; and that relating to dam infrastructure, more specifically. Originality/value: Minimal literature exists regarding innovations in British dam building so the study is especially original in that respect.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dams; history; industry; infrastructure; innovation
Index terms: methodology, reservoir, history, data analysis, case study, aesthetic
Subjects: data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, architectural and construction history, factor and component analysis, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here