Alwan, Z and Gledson, B J (2015) Towards green building performance evaluation using asset information modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(3), pp. 290-303. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a unique conceptual framework for integrated asset management strategy that includes making use of available facility assessment methods and tools such as BREEAM In-Use, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED); and highlights proposes areas of commonality between these and the use of as-built Building Information Modelling, that ultimately becomes the Asset Information Model (AIM). This framework will consider the emerging requirements for the capture of Building Performance Attribute Data (BPAD), and how these can be managed in order to assist with effective post-construction building performance evaluation. Design/methodology/approach - A review of the current process relevant to the development of as-built BIMs and AIMs was undertaken which included a discussion of BIM standards and of the COBie process. This was combined with data provided by industry practitioners. This led to the concept of BPADs being developed, to be used within existing green building tool, BREEAM In-Use, COBIE and FM/Asset management methods. In turn these methodologies were used to identify possible synergies and areas of integration in AIM-enabled environments. Findings - Recognising the cyclical nature of asset management and BIM, a conceptual model was generated. It was found that BPADs could be aggregated within an AIM model which could influence the delivery of effective facilities and asset management. The model considers the use of existing Building Management Systems (BMS) and Computer Aided Facility Management Systems (CAFMs) and identifies issues associated with the overall sustainability strategy. Originality/value - A conceptual framework is generated that proposes the use of effective information management and aggregation of BPAD within an AIM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; asset information management; as-built bim; building performance attribute data; facilities management |
| Index terms: | building performance, asset management, environmental design, BREEAM accreditation, strategy, information modelling, building management system, building information modelling, conceptual framework, facilities management, building performance evaluation, performance evaluation, synergy, methodology, facility management system, integration, asset information management, practitioner, green building |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, environmental policy, practitioner, mechanical systems, information systems, quality assurance, building performance, asset management, organizational analysis, partnership management, digital design, research methods, theoretical framing, design practice, management, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here