Gathering and disseminating lessons learned in construction companies to support knowledge management

Debs, L and Hubbard, B (2023) Gathering and disseminating lessons learned in construction companies to support knowledge management. Construction Economics and Building, 23(1-2), pp. 56-76. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

The importance of knowledge management (KM) in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry has risen with the improvement of information and communication technologies. However, the construction industry still struggles to capture and disseminate lessons learned. The present research explores this issue by using interviews and an online questionnaire, to provide updated information on lesson-learned procedures and their challenges in United States (US) construction companies. To do this, the authors have gathered industry professionals' perceptions about lessons learned and methods used in their companies for harnessing and disseminating the knowledge generated by them. Our findings indicate that post-project evaluations are frequently conducted, utilize a two-step approach (review of materials followed by meetings), and are mainly organized by project managers. Most often, only key project team members are present in meetings to create a safe environment for discussion. Moreover, our findings echo previous research on the dissemination and reuse of lessons learned, indicating that these procedures are scattered and, most of the time, the information is not effectively reutilized. This suggests that US construction companies still need to revisit how information from lessons learned is currently being harnessed, stored, and especially shared (within and between companies) so that information can be effectively transformed into knowledge that can advance the AEC industry's productivity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: project team; communication; knowledge management; reuse; United States; professional; project manager; interview
Index terms: productivity, construction company, United States, interview, information and communication technology, project manager, lessons learned, construction industry, project team, knowledge management, project evaluation, dissemination, questionnaire
Subjects: project delivery, organization, data collection methods, profession, computing systems, value management, industry analysis, management, professional development, knowledge translation, Geography
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here