Task-based defect management: Anatomical classification

Almusharraf, A and Whyte, A (2016) Task-based defect management: Anatomical classification. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(3), pp. 345-358. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose - Studies on the construction defects and quality deviations have been commissioned and published in many countries, showing the global status of the issues related with construction defects. Therefore, the quality of the adapted practices in construction projects can be improved if the pattern of the sub-task, specifically the quality deviations and construction defects from the requirements and specifications is identified and understood. The purpose of this paper is to improve understanding of the behavior and pattern of the more sensitivity sub-task requirements (STRs) through the anatomy process of a particular task. Design/methodology/approach - Six criteria have been classified for the levels of the estimated STRs quality deviations. The proposed study classifications were examined through the 3,030 cases of 17 STRs from compression concrete members (i.e. column). Findings - Most of the STRs were found to be prone to deviations and the sensitivities of the STRs toward deviations and defects are varied across all STRs. The study reveals that three of the 17 STRs were observed as perfect works, ten STRs as acceptable works and four STRs as defective works. Originality/value - The study found that the sub-task deviation patterns cannot be generalized and must be individually studied to recommend the appropriate proactive measures.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: quality management; construction industry; defects; building projects; quality deviation; sub-tasks requirements
Index terms: construction project, methodology, sub-task requirement, quality management, construction industry, defect management, specification, construction defect, compression, deviation, quality deviation, column
Subjects: operations management, financial and cost management, contract obligations, quality assurance, industry analysis, research methods, structural engineering, production management, material properties and characteristics, contractual condition
Topics: Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here