Alqahtani, A and Whyte, A (2016) Estimation of life-cycle costs of buildings: Regression vs artificial neural network. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(1), pp. 30-43. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of regression and artificial-neural-networks (ANNs) methods to estimate the running cost of building projects towards improved accuracy. Design/methodology/approach - A data set of 20 building projects is used to test the performance of these two (ANNs/regression) models in estimating running cost. The concept of cost-significant-items is identified as important in assisting estimation. In addition, a stepwise technique is used to eliminate insignificant factors in regression modelling. A connection weight method is applied to determine the importance of cost factors in the performance of ANNs. Findings - The results illustrate that the value of the coefficient of determination=99.75 per cent for ANNs model(s), with a value of 98.1 per cent utilising multiple regression (MR) model(s); second, the mean percentage error (MPE) for ANNs at a testing stage is 0.179, which is less than that of the MPE gained through MR modelling of 1.28; and third, the average accuracy is 99 per cent for ANNs model(s) and 97 per cent for MR model(s). On the basis of these results, it is concluded that an ANNs model is superior to a MR model when predicting running cost of building projects. Research limitations/implications - A means for continuous improvement for the performance of the models accuracy has been established; this may be further enhanced by future extended sample. Originality/value - This work extends the knowledge base of life-cycle estimation where ANNs method has been found to reduce preparation time consumed and increasing accuracy improvement of the cost estimation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | connection weight; artificial-neural-networks; building projects; cost-significant items; life-cycle estimation; multiple regression |
| Index terms: | testing, methodology, estimate, modelling, regression modelling, multiple-regression, continuous improvement, connection weight, estimating, running cost, knowledge base, artificial neural network, accuracy, estimation, cost estimating, cost factor |
| Subjects: | information systems, performance measurement, financial and cost management, research methods, analytical methods, economics, professional practice, professional development, modelling and simulation, statistical analysis, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here