Adopting qualitative data in conceptual system dynamic modelling

Mahmud, A; Ogunlana, S O; Hong, W T; Yahaya, I W and Akoh, S R (2023) Adopting qualitative data in conceptual system dynamic modelling. Construction Economics and Building, 23(3-4), pp. 71-86. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Qualitative data plays an important role in system dynamics (SD) modelling, particularly in model conceptualization. Among the various forms of data, information from the mental database of stakeholders is considered the most important which can be accessed through stakeholder engagement using interviews. However, formal, and systematic process of interview and data analysis is required. Existing approaches used for systematically analysing qualitative data were based on grounded theory approach. In this study, we introduced a coding approach that is formulated based on the principles of thematic analysis, saliency analysis (an extension of thematic analysis) framework and case study approach, and key strengths of existing methods. This alternative or formulated approach is focused on (i) coding the data from all stakeholder groups, (ii) establishing causal relationships from causal attributions of stakeholders and transform the causal relationships into causal maps and (iii) establishing and maintain strong links between causal maps and data source using data source reference table and software. We then demonstrate an application of the coding approach in a study about cost performance of road infrastructure projects in Nigeria to analyse qualitative data collected from 16 semi-structured interviews.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: qualitative data; road infrastructure project; system dynamics; thematic analysis; Nigeria; interview
Index terms: interview, case study, maps, data analysis, grounded theory, database, Nigeria, system dynamics, thematic analysis, stakeholder engagement, modelling, dynamic modelling, infrastructure project, cost performance
Subjects: methods and analysis, Geography, spatial and geospatial analysis, economics, theoretical framing, infrastructure and transport systems, data management, community and social dimensions, computing systems, data collection methods, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation
Topics: Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here