Sustainable management of NHS assets backlog maintenance

Pantzartzis, E; Deka, L; Price, A D F; Tann, C; Mills, G R W and Rich-Mahadkar, S (2016) Sustainable management of NHS assets backlog maintenance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(5), pp. 535-552. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose Lord Carter’s (2015) “Review of Operational Productivity in NHS providers” stated that to improve National Health Service (NHS) England’s efficiency, operational productivity should be targeted in four main areas, one being estates management. NHS England’s estate includes a variety of buildings some of which are considered no longer fit-for-purpose, thus creating risk to patients and staff. These built assets require continuous maintenance, adding pressures to NHS England’s precarious financial situation. The purpose of this paper is to identify positive strategies and major constraints to achieving sustainable management of backlog maintenance (BM) across the NHS assets, and thus suggest balanced actions. Design/methodology/approach The research adopts a qualitative approach and combines: literature review of current BM methodologies; interviews with estates and facilities directors from seven NHS trusts on BM strategies; and a NHS trust detailed case study. Findings The major finding is that sustainable management of BM is achievable if there is a consistent, pro-active and long-term strategic approach where critical levels of BM are prioritised. Additional issues (i.e. appropriate methodology, performance metrics and links with clinical service delivery strategies) also need to be considered. Practical implications This study is relevant to the management of the NHS estate including development and adoption of sustainable strategies. Originality/value This paper offers original insights to the factors influencing healthcare estates' BM at a time when the UK policy agenda is targeting infrastructure operational efficiency and organisations are seeking more comprehensive methodologies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: healthcare; strategy; risk; asset management; critical infrastructure; backlog maintenance
Index terms: qualitative approach, asset management, productivity, strategy, sustainable management, literature review, case study, service delivery, health service, efficiency, interview, England, performance metric, critical infrastructure, built asset, backlog maintenance, methodology
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, business, data collection methods, asset management, infrastructure and transport systems, performance management, public and environmental health, research methods, performance measurement, management, Geography, health safety and environment, service delivery
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here