Rose, J and Jayawickrama, J (2016) Capacity building of institutions for disaster risk reduction: Learning from communities as first responders. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(4), pp. 391-402. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the role of local communities in responding to crises and disasters. The paper highlights that most communities have their own mechanisms of dealing with uncertainties and dangers produced by disasters. The paper acknowledges that most disaster response and disaster risk reduction (DDR) organisations advocate to work with local communities and most seek to build the capacity of these communities. Design/methodology/approach The authors draw on a series of case studies gathered together with their experience over the past decade of working with both local communities that have been affected by disasters and international organisations involved in DDR and humanitarian responses. Findings This paper concludes that whilst international institutions continue to make attempts at building the capacity of local communities they need to seek to work collaboratively with local communities. International institutions must ultimately learn from them and build their own capacity for developing context specific and effective DDR strategies and disaster responses. Originality/value This paper offers local case studies that give a rare insight into some of the ways local communities deal with disasters and view international responses to disasters and conflicts. This paper demonstrates the role of local communities in building the capacity of international institutions for DDR.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case studies; disasters; communities; community development; capacity development; citizen participation |
| Index terms: | disaster risk reduction, case study, strategy, disaster response, international organization, citizen participation, community development, methodology, capacity building, humanitarian, capacity development |
| Subjects: | management, data collection methods, environmental hazards, communities and social development, research methods, social and economic development, emergency and crisis management, participation process, principle, strategic management |
| Topics: | Ethics, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here