Corporate social responsibility in construction industry: A comparative study between UK and Turkey

Ulutaş, D D; Giritli, H and McDermott, P (2016) Corporate social responsibility in construction industry: A comparative study between UK and Turkey. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(2), pp. 218-231. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose - Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has evolved to an important agenda for many industries and its scope has been widened from the responsible business to strategic decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the concept of CSR from the perspective of construction industry by questioning CSR awareness, CSR activities and CSR integration with a comparative case study between UK and Turkey. Design/methodology/approach - Conducting comparative and qualitative research using a case study methodology, this study sets the context for understanding differences in these two countries as to how CSR is perceived and put into practice by selected case firms. Findings - The results revealed that construction companies are aware of the increasing importance of the CSR; however, company scale and the characteristics of the country have great impact on CSR preferences. Despite the differences in the approaches all firms take with regard to CSR domains and CSR types, ethical domain and the social orientation have become prominent for CSR initiatives in both the UK and Turkey. Originality/value - This study provides the empirical evidence for the understanding and integration of the CSR concept in the construction industry; shed light on missing knowledge about CSR integration and serves as a source for further in-depth researches on CSR.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: responsibility; Turkey; UK; stakeholders; corporate culture; construction management; environment; business strategy; economic sustainability; construction companies; corporate social responsibility
Index terms: construction industry, preference, corporate social responsibility, methodology, qualitative research, comparative study, economic sustainability, integration, evidence, corporate culture, business strategy, construction company, case study, Turkey
Subjects: industry analysis, organizational analysis, sociology, health safety and environment, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, economic analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, organization, research design and methodology, business
Topics: Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here