Water use efficiency and conservation during construction: Drivers, barriers and practices

Waidyasekara, K G A S; De Silva, L and Rameezdeen, R (2016) Water use efficiency and conservation during construction: Drivers, barriers and practices. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(5), pp. 553-566. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore ways to enhance water use efficiency at construction sites according to project stakeholders' perceptions. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey was developed based on drivers, barriers and potential water use efficiency measures identified through a literature review. It was administered among professionals working in the construction industry who have more than ten years of work experience. Findings The study highlighted cost of water and sources of water as main drivers that promote water use efficiency on sites. Lack of priority for water management among host of other managerial functions was identified as the main barrier. In order to conserve water, respondents favoured “soft” measures such as changes in workers' behaviour and managerial policies and planning for water savings, as opposed to “hard” measures which were primarily technology based. Research limitations/implications The major implications of the study are related to how behaviour of the workers could be changed to accommodate water use efficiency in their everyday activities. Water saving measures such as leak detection, auditing and sub-metering were favoured by respondents referring to policies and planning, as well as implementing a water action plan when a project begins. Originality/value This study makes a contribution to the body of knowledge on the subject of water sustainability at construction projects. This is an understudied area. In addition, the findings will enhance the understanding of construction companies on water use efficiency and should serve as a platform to develop improved and appropriate techniques.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: water efficiency; water conservation; water use; behaviour of the workers; construction site
Index terms: conservation, body of knowledge, construction industry, questionnaire, project stakeholder, construction project, methodology, construction company, survey, savings, construction site, literature review, platform, water management, efficiency, water conservation
Subjects: digital design, production management, performance management, research methods, industry analysis, occupational health, sociology, organization, data collection methods, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, environmental resource management, work location, environmental policy
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here