Xia, B; Wu, T; Skitmore, M; Chen, Q; Li, M and Zuo, J (2016) Delivering sustainable communities: A case study in China. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(3), pp. 253-267. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose - China’s accelerated urbanisation leads directly to pressure on the urban environment. The purpose of this paper is to identify best practices involved in a real sustainable community projects for the experience to be replicated in future. Design/methodology/approach - To explore the practical development experiences and technological applications, a case study was conducted, involving both document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Findings - The findings identify the green technologies and strategies used in the project planning and design process. The social considerations of the project development are also recognised in providing comfort, convenience and safety for their residents. Furthermore, the research highlights the fact that sustainable communities can incur less operational costs compared with traditional ones and therefore provide a feasible option for clients with a greater capability for upfront investment. Originality/value - The results of the research provide valuable references for developers in the development of sustainable communities in both China and other countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; case study; project development; green building; best practice; sustainable community |
| Index terms: | case study, design process, interview, urbanization, sustainable community, strategy, document analysis, green building, comfort, methodology, best practice, urban environment, project planning, option, project development, China |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, communities and social development, design practice, management, research methods, Geography, urban planning, data science, project delivery, data collection methods, business, urban sustainability, control systems, design methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here