Kumaraswamy, M; Wong, K K W and Chung, J (2017) Focusing megaproject strategies on sustainable best value of stakeholders. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(4), pp. 441-455. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
This paper illustrates the stakeholder management principles and practices with a view to enhance megaproject strategies revealing that inadequate stakeholder engagement has led to many process disruptions and adverse outcomes in recent megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability; relationship management; stakeholder value; stakeholder management; built infrastructure; megaprojects |
| Index terms: | best value, stakeholder value, relationship management, megaproject, stakeholder engagement, strategy, stakeholder management, built infrastructure |
| Subjects: | community and social dimensions, strategic project management, bidding, management, building construction, participation process |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Human Resources, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here