Current context of transport sector in south Asia: Recommendations towards a sustainable transportation system

Liyanage, C; Dias, N; Amaratunga, D and Haigh, R (2017) Current context of transport sector in south Asia: Recommendations towards a sustainable transportation system. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(5), pp. 490-505. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose Given the current focus on sustainable development, there is a need to identify the current status of the transport sector in developing countries and the obstacles to the development of a sustainable transport system. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review on what needs to be done in such countries towards a sustainable transportation system. The focus of the paper will be on the South Asian context. In order to achieve the aim, the paper examines the current issues, the policy context and the key actions required in the countries selected in South Asia (i.e. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives and Nepal). Design/methodology/approach The main method used for the project was a combination of semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In addition, a policy analysis was also carried out with a use of secondary data. Altogether, 348 interviews and 16 focus groups (with 157 participants) were carried out in the selected six countries. Although the purpose of the research methods was to carry out a situational analysis of each country mentioned above on seven societal challenges identified under the EU’s Horizon 2020 research programme, this paper only focusses on presenting the findings relating to sustainable transport. Findings Findings reveal that South Asian countries need to improve different aspects of their transportation sector, starting from national-level transportation policies. Sustainable transportation is not merely about mobility but also about creating safer, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation systems. Some key actions needed for these include introducing driver and passenger safety regulations, establishing vehicle emissions test centres to reduce CO2 emissions, and introducing public-private partnerships where useful. Originality/value This study provides a robust policy direction towards the introduction/improvement of a sustainable transportation system in South Asian countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: government policies; mobility; safety; safety measures; sustainable transport; key actions
Index terms: Asia, methodology, Pakistan, government policy, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, regulation, Maldives, Afghanistan, key action, policy analysis, developing country, interview, environmentally friendly, CO2 emissions, mobility, sustainable transportation system, focus group, safety measures, sustainable transport, transportation sector, Bhutan, sustainable development, partnership, programme, secondary data
Subjects: control systems, policy studies, air quality, data collection methods, regions and continents, sustainable transportation, public policy, development economics, sustainable design, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, political science, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls, partnership management
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Time Control, International Construction, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here