Pribadi, K S; Martek, I and Chan, T K (2023) Inequality and vulnerability of informal employment during the pandemic. Construction Economics and Building, 23(3-4), pp. 25-44. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
This study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on formal and informal workers in the Indonesian construction industry. Based on a questionnaire survey of workers in the province of West Java, it aims to test the view that informal workers are more vulnerable to job losses, wage cuts and the lack of social security safety net. Two research questions were posed. The first was to characterise the impact of the COVID preventative measures on their access to work, work hours, and income levels. The second objective was to examine the implementation of COVID-19 health and safety protocols at project sites and its impact on workers. A survey conducted in November and December 2020 in the province of West Java obtained 261 responses from 21 construction companies. Contingency table testing was carried out to test the hypothesis that the frequencies of occurrence in the formal and informal worker categories are independent of the frequencies in incomes and health and safety protocols. Contrary to job losses and wage cuts report in the literature, construction companies in West Java have resisted cutting the wages of informal workers and instead directed wage cuts to their higher paid formal workers. Compliance to COVID-19 health and safety protocols at project sites was reported to be high. This study makes unique contribution to the understanding of informal work in the construction industry and the impact of the recent pandemic on the incomes and workers' welfare.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | COVID-19; West java; health and safety; informality; wages |
| Index terms: | health and safety, wages, pandemic, compliance, COVID-19, survey, construction company, employment, vulnerability, questionnaire, income, inequality, implementation, testing, construction industry |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, industry analysis, sociology, business economics, health safety and environment, management, health risk and incident analysis, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, professional practice, organization, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Human Resources, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here