Weerasinghe, R P N P and Sandanayake, Y G (2017) Collaborative facilities management model: Sri Lankan perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(3), pp. 284-299. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
This paper develops a collaborative facilities management (CFM) model incorporating facilities management functions that can be shared and performed collaboratively by organisations, revealing that core business, geographical location and ownership are identified as the key dimensions that affect CFM concept.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | core business; information; facilities management; ownership; collaborative facilities management model; facility services; geographical location; utilities/infrastructure |
| Index terms: | core busines, facility services, utilities, ownership, dimension, facilities management, collaborative facilities management |
| Subjects: | management, economics, service delivery, collaborative management, construction type, business, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here