Zeb, J (2017) An eco asset ontology towards effective eco asset management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(4), pp. 388-399. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
This paper develops an ontology of eco assets to represent eco asset knowledge at two levels: eco asset metal model and eco asset ontology, revealing that the knowledge representation is consistent, concise, clear, complete and correct.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset management; eco asset; eco asset knowledge management; eco asset management; eco asset ontology; natural asset |
| Index terms: | metal, knowledge management, eco-asset, eco-asset management, ontology, asset management, natural asset |
| Subjects: | asset management, traditional and composite building materials, education and knowledge transfer, professional development, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here