Health and safety challenges among post-disaster reconstruction workers

Uddin, S M J; Albert, A; Pradhananga, N; Ganapati, N E and Prajapati, J (2023) Health and safety challenges among post-disaster reconstruction workers. Construction Economics and Building, 23(1-2), pp. 4-30. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

With the increase in the number of natural disasters in recent years, post-disaster reconstruction (PDR) efforts have become increasingly important to aid community recovery. Accordingly, a large body of recent research has focused on identifying the best practices for accelerating recovery and restoring impacted communities. However, relatively little attention has been devoted to the health and safety challenges experienced by reconstruction workers that aid post-disaster recovery and reconstruction efforts. The current investigation focused on addressing this knowledge gap by seeking to uncover the health and safety challenges that reconstruction workers experienced in the context of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal – that was responsible for nearly 9,000 deaths and 22,000 injuries. The data collection effort involved in-depth interviews with several stakeholders, including construction workers, supervisors, site engineers, general contractors, homeowners, and governmental officials. This study enhances our understanding of the health and safety challenges experienced by PDR workers. The study also offers insight on how the obtained knowledge can be leveraged by government and stakeholders with supervisory roles to ensure proper health, safety, and wellbeing of the reconstruction workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: wellbeing; earthquake; government; health and safety; safety; Nepal; natural disaster; best practice; construction worker; stakeholder; interview
Index terms: health and safety, interview, investigation, post-disaster reconstruction, reconstruction, supervisor, best practice, natural disaster, injury, well-being, Nepal, post-disaster recovery, general contractor, construction worker, homeowner, engineer, recovery, earthquake
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, Geography, profession, health conditions and diseases, post-disaster and reconstruction, sociology, business, building construction, operations management, mental health and wellbeing, environmental hazards, health safety and environment
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here