Saeed, A M; Duffield, C and Hui, F K P (2018) An enhanced framework for assessing the operational performance of public-private partnership school projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(2), pp. 194-214. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: A study of the current practices for evaluating the ex-post performance of public-private partnership (PPP) school projects in Australia via literature review and qualitative case studies has found that no consistent approach exists for evaluating operational performance. A detailed critique of international PPP audits and practices has identified existing gaps in ex-post performance evaluation. Through a process of comparative analysis and industry confirmation, a performance analysis technique aligned with international practice has been developed that can be utilised by the educational departments across Australia to evaluate the ex-post performance of PPP projects (PPPs). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This paper opted for qualitative archival analysis of case studies using pattern matching, explanation building, time series, and comparative analysis. The data used for document analysis included value reports, project summaries, and contract documents, as well as local and international audit guidelines. Findings: This paper reviewed current practices, identified a range of processes, and reported the best practices. However, consideration of the approaches taken in the UK and Australia for evaluating operational performance indicates that current techniques lack consistency. Research limitations/implications: The developed ex-post performance measurement framework is limited to Australian PPP school projects and, at this stage, cannot be generalised to other social PPP projects. Practical implications: The paper includes implications for the development of better performance evaluation practices and audits. Social implications: An enhanced framework for measuring operational performance will increase the accountability of taxpayers in the content of their utilisation by the government. Originality/value: This paper presents an enhanced ex-post performance measurement framework for education departments across Australia.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | auditing guidelines; Australian schools; operation audit; performance management systems; procurement; public-private partnership |
| Index terms: | performance management, time series, case study, literature review, partnership, document analysis, accountability, critique, audit, Australia, comparative analysis, performance analysis, best practice, methodology, contract document, international practice, ex-post performance, performance evaluation |
| Subjects: | business, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, strategic management, data science, data analysis and analytics, Geography, contractual condition, research methods, performance management, performance measurement, liability law, partnership management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, International Construction, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here