Toward improved LCC-informed decisions in building management

Salvado, F; Almeida, N M and Vale e Azevedo, A (2018) Toward improved LCC-informed decisions in building management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(2), pp. 114-133. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: Stakeholders of the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sector require information on the buildings economic performance throughout its life cycle. This information is neither readily available nor always accurate because building management (BM) professionals still face difficulties to fully incorporate the life cycle cost (LCC) concept into their daily practice. The purpose of this paper is to identify and contribute to solving these difficulties. Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides a background knowledge review and set the ground for a structured research roadmap and a management framework that highlight the links and limitations to be addressed within and between LCC and BM. A six-stage method was used for developing conceptual frameworks targeting six goals: establishing a point of departure; mapping sources of information; literature research; notion deconstruction and conceptual categorization; overview of the applicable background knowledge; and structuring of a framework for LCC-informed decisions in BM. Findings: Management solutions for the built context are necessarily connected with LCC and BM current concepts such as asset management, project, program and portfolio management, facility management and data management. These management approaches highlight the importance of incorporating life cycle concepts and promote LCC effective application within the AEC sector. Originality/value: This paper identifies and discusses current limitations on the information availability for the economic performance of buildings throughout its life cycle. This work also identifies LCC-related topics that need to be further explored or addressed by both the scientific community and practitioners to overcome these limitations and facilitate the integration of the LCC concept into BM activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: asset management; building management; economic sustainability; facility management; life cycle cost; programme and portfolio management; project
Index terms: program, methodology, economic sustainability, mapping, integration, practitioner, conceptual framework, portfolio management, building management, face, data management, research roadmap, asset management, life cycle, programme, life cycle cost
Subjects: research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, software systems, theoretical framing, management, asset management, research management, data management, project controls, organizational analysis, practitioner, value management, psychology, economic analysis
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here