Tokede, O; Udawatta, N and Luther, M (2018) Retrofitting heritage office buildings in the UK: A case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(1), pp. 39-50. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose Heritage buildings are a crucial part of the UK built sector. They perpetuate a sense of identity, prestige and community. Many heritage buildings however tend to be energy inefficient and the scope for retrofitting such buildings is paramount. Heritage buildings require ratification from planning bodies in order to undertake any alteration on the building. This tends to create a bottleneck in the retrofitting of heritage office buildings. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach This study utilises a case study building in Scotland to evaluate the potential for retrofitting in a UK heritage office building. Building energy simulation software is used to generate the energy data in different retrofit options. A scenario analysis on the heritage status of the building is also undertaken. Findings The costs, energy consumption and carbon emission levels are evaluated and compared. It was found that the differential in annual energy savings achieved, based on the proportion of capital cost to operational cost, is 14.6 per cent in the heritage building, compared to 24.6 per cent in the non-heritage building. Originality/value The study suggests that government and other stakeholders should seek for ways of incentivising retrofit investments in heritage buildings. This will provide an effective way of minimising the contributions of the built environment to global warming and climate change.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy efficiency; built environment; simulation; retrofitting; office buildings; heritage buildings |
| Index terms: | identity, built environment, scenario analysis, Scotland, heritage building, methodology, building energy simulation, energy consumption, energy-saving, option, climate change, retrofitting, case study, carbon emission, capital cost, energy efficiency, global warming, office building |
| Subjects: | climate science, data collection methods, construction type, policy studies, energy systems, sustainability and energy, Geography, renovation and retrofit, research methods, accounting and finance, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here