Juan, C and Olmos, F (2019) Public-private equity joint ventures and risk transfers in motorways of the sea. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(5), pp. 669-682. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a new scheme of public–private partnership (PPP) within the framework of motorways of the sea (MoS) similar to that of an equity joint venture along with a methodology for valuing risk transfers arising from options embedded in the clauses included in such agreement. Design/methodology/approach: The architecture of the proposed PPP is an adaptation to the scope of a MoS of collaborative schemes commonly used in industry such as equity joint ventures. The methodology for valuing options involved making use of a valuation tree of optimal cashflows along with algorithm designs from the field of financial and real options. Findings: The proposed structure of public–private equity joint venture (PPEJV) increases the stability of private–public collaboration as compared with standard PPPs, so as to achieve the desired modal shift. The analyzed case study shows how the methodology provides valuable numerical information for both negotiating partners and policy makers. Practical implications: This study provides a quantitative tool for policy makers to redefine the role that public agents and public funds should play in a future sustainable mobility model. Originality/value: The originality of the authors' contribution to the field of PPPs in transport is triple. First, there is no precedent in the literature on PPPs of an architecture similar to that of the proposed PPEJV. Second, unlike the usual practice in the valuation of financial or real options, no prior structure is assumed for modelling the behaviour of cashflows. Third, the type of options addressed is not usual neither in the real options literature in general nor in the valuation of guarantee mechanisms included in PPPs in particular.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual real options; flexible strategic planning; intermodal transportation; motorways of the sea; public–private partnerships; risk transfers |
| Index terms: | strategic planning, collaboration, methodology, negotiating, private equity, agent, modelling, real option, option, guarantee, case study, mobility, joint venture, partnership, stability, adaptation |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, partnership management, conflict resolution, research methods, management, contract structure, structural engineering, analytical methods, economic analysis, practitioner, business, user focus, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here