Pricing of highway infrastructure for transportation asset management

Lim, T; Porras-Alvarado, J D and Zhang, Z (2019) Pricing of highway infrastructure for transportation asset management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(1), pp. 64-79. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a methodology for estimating the “price,” or the not-to-loss value, of individual highway assets, which reflects not only the assets' capital value but also economic productivity, by adopting a productivity-based asset valuation framework. The price tags can be used in prioritizing highway assets in support of transportation asset management processes. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology adopts the utility theory to consider multiple performance measures reflecting the economic productivity generated by the assets, as well as their capital value. Key performance measures are first selected, and their values are retrieved from highway asset management databases. Next, the utility functions representing decision makers' preferences convert the performance measures into utility values, which adjust the replacement cost (RC) of each highway asset to estimate price tags. To demonstrate its applicability, case studies were conducted for the highway networks of Texas and Washington State in the USA. Findings: The methodology yielded price tags that better reflect the importance of highways' roles in the economy in comparison to methods where only RCs are used. Furthermore, it was proven to be flexible enough to accommodate local conditions such as varying data availability. Originality/value: The research provides a practical and reasonable way to prioritize critical highway assets in purport of maintenance and rehabilitation resource allocations, based on their economic productivity as well as physical condition and historical cost information, enhancing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of highway asset management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: highway asset; highway asset prioritization; maintenance resource allocation; productivity-based asset valuation; transportation asset management; utility theory
Index terms: resource allocation, efficiency, cost information, case study, prioritizing, pricing, productivity, performance measure, asset management, utility theory, database, methodology, effectiveness, highway infrastructure, estimate, preference, replacement, estimating
Subjects: financial and cost management, resource management, economic analysis, data collection methods, materials science, data management, asset management, decision analysis, economic theory, management, performance measurement, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, performance management, civil engineering, accounting and finance
Topics: Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here