Madanayake, U H and Egbu, C (2019) Critical analysis for big data studies in construction: Significant gaps in knowledge. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(4), pp. 530-547. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the gaps and potential future research avenues in the big data research specifically in the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: The paper adopts systematic literature review (SLR) approach to observe and understand trends and extant patterns/themes in the big data analytics (BDA) research area particularly in construction-specific literature. Findings: A significant rise in construction big data research is identified with an increasing trend in number of yearly articles. The main themes discussed were big data as a concept, big data analytical methods/techniques, big data opportunities – challenges and big data application. The paper emphasises “the implication of big data in to overall sustainability” as a gap that needs to be addressed. These implications are categorised as social, economic and environmental aspects. Research limitations/implications: The SLR is carried out for construction technology and management research for the time period of 2007–2017 in Scopus and Emerald databases only. Practical implications: The paper enables practitioners to explore the key themes discussed around big data research as well as the practical applicability of big data techniques. The advances in existing big data research inform practitioners the current social, economic and environmental implications of big data which would ultimately help them to incorporate into their strategies to pursue competitive advantage. Identification of knowledge gaps helps keep the academic research move forward for a continuously evolving body of knowledge. The suggested new research avenues will inform future researchers for potential trending and untouched areas for research. Social implications: Identification of knowledge gaps helps keep the academic research move forward for continuous improvement while learning. The continuously evolving body of knowledge is an asset to the society in terms of revealing the truth about emerging technologies. Originality/value: There is currently no comprehensive review that addresses social, economic and environmental implications of big data in construction literature. Through this paper, these gaps are identified and filled in an understandable way. This paper establishes these gaps as key issues to consider for the continuous future improvement of big data research in the context of the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | big data analytics; built environment; construction industry; data analysis; knowledge gaps; systematic review |
| Index terms: | continuous improvement, data analysis, competitive advantage, practitioner, emerging technology, strategy, big data, database, methodology, systematic literature review, construction technology, construction industry, society, management research, built environment, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | research methods, digital engineering, innovation and technology management, performance measurement, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, management, practitioner, data management, information systems, knowledge management, market analysis, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, research evaluation and metrics, communities and social development |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Information Management, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here