Cakmak, P I and Akturk, B (2024) An in-depth investigation of digital construction technologies from a building economics perspective. Construction Economics and Building, 24(3), pp. 40-75. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
While initial costs in building economics cover a small portion of the costs incurred during its life-cycle, most occur in construction, operation, and subsequent processes. Despite its numerous contributions to building economics, the construction industry is slowly adapting to digital technologies. To overcome the barriers and crown the assets with their proper management, dynamic applications of digital tools and techniques of Industry 4.0 need to emerge in the construction industry. Therefore, this study aims to present an integrative approach that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques to critically review the available literature on the potential contributions of digital construction technologies to building economics through the post-design phases of the life cycle. The primary focus of the investigation is how digital technologies can overcome prevalent problems and how they can impact building economics. The study contributes to the field by providing an awareness that will inform researchers and practitioners of the trends, gaps, and more profound exchange of ideas in future research efforts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building economics; construction; digital technologies; post-design phases |
| Index terms: | qualitative analysis, investigation, practitioner, building economics, design phase, digital technology, construction industry, digital construction, industry 4.0, life cycle |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, cost management, data collection methods, research design and methodology, computing systems, practitioner, value management, professional practice, technology adoption |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here