Zhang, Y and Tan, W (2019) The leading small group: An institutional innovation for PPP projects in China. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(2), pp. 291-301. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: It is widely recognized that large-scale public–private partnership (PPP) projects require an effective coordination mechanism among various stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. The purpose of this paper is to provide an insight into how this may be achieved through the leading small group (LSG), which is a distinctive informal Chinese institution for coordination among various public agencies. Design/methodology/approach: An in-depth case study using secondary data and five in-depth interviews with two staff members from the developer and three government officials involved is used to probe into how the LSG functions during the various development phases of the Yangzhou Teda Waste-to-Energy project. Findings: The main finding is that, conditional on its capacity, the LSG coordinated various public agencies to promote fast project implementation and ensure its smooth operation by making high-level decisions, facilitating quick permits and approvals, and mitigating the risks. However, formalization and participation from other stakeholders are needed to ensure good governance. Research limitations/implications: Because it is an exploratory case study, the findings cannot be readily generalized. Further research can be done to compare the performance of LSGs in different Chinese cities and PPP projects. Practical implications: It is supposed that this paper can provide implications of designing effective coordination mechanisms for managing large-scale PPP projects. Originality/value: This paper provides an account of the LSG as a distinctive Chinese coordination mechanism that has been rarely studied.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coordination; governance; infrastructure management; institution; project management; public–private partnership |
| Index terms: | coordination, project management, life cycle, partnership, interview, approval, China, secondary data, infrastructure management, case study, implementation, governance, waste-to-energy, agency, methodology |
| Subjects: | Geography, sociology, research methods, contractual role, partnership management, value management, project management theory and practice, management, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, business, waste management, infrastructure engineering |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Governance, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here