Abdullahi Ahmed, U; Noor Amila Wan Abdullah, Z and Abdul-Rashid, A-A (2021) Malaysian regulators' ranking of PPP contract governance skills. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), pp. 88-102. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the skills required by regulatory agencies for effective governance of public-private partnership (PPP) contracts from the perspective of Malaysian regulators. There is a growing literature indicating that there is poor public sector expertise in managing PPP projects. The study, being an exploratory one, relied on a questionnaire survey of the Malaysian PPP unit (UKAS) and five Malaysian regulatory agencies responsible for regulating service delivery across a number of sectors. The results of the exploratory factor analysis returned six factor groupings, indicating that the most important skills are procurement, auditing and forensic accounting, lifecycle costing, sector-specific, negotiation analysis and performance management. It was also found that academic qualifications, profession, years of experience and the regulatory agency had no mediating effect on the rankings. The findings show that infrastructure regulation training programs should be tailored to reflect regional and country-specific characteristics. This is because a similar study with a globalised set of respondents gave a different result from the current study. There is a growing trend towards remunicipalisations and contract cancellations globally. This is the very outcome that regulatory agencies were created to prevent. Studies including government reports are increasingly pointing in the direction of poor skills set among public sector staff managing PPPs. This lack of capacity has resulted in poor oversight, which now threatens the sustainability of service provision.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure regulation; public sector; contract governance; privatization; life cycle analysis; sustainability; developing countries; UK; USA; Malaysia; France; Germany |
| Index terms: | profession, program, contract governance, Germany, lifecycle, questionnaire, accounting, privatization, costing, negotiation, France, performance management, exploratory factor analysis, developing country, Malaysia, service delivery, qualification, governance, partnership, regulatory agency, life cycle analysis, regulator, survey, public sector, infrastructure regulation |
| Subjects: | development economics, Geography, service delivery, software systems, monitoring and control systems, accounting and finance, educational resources, performance measurement, statistical analysis, administrative law, sociology, partnership management, conflict resolution, institututions, environmental impact, business, data collection methods, project delivery, economic analysis, corporate governance |
| Topics: | International Construction, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Education, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here