Developing an integrated framework for optimization of spatial requirements of construction equipment

Hemalattha, S and Vidjeapriya, R (2021) Developing an integrated framework for optimization of spatial requirements of construction equipment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(5), pp. 903-917. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

This study aims to develop a framework for optimizing the spatial requirements of the equipment in a construction site using a geographic information system (GIS). An ongoing construction project, an existing thermal powerplant in India, is considered to be the case study, and the corresponding construction activities were scheduled. The equipment spaces were defined for the scheduled activities in building information modelling (BIM), which was further imported to GIS to define the topology rules, validate and optimize the spatial requirements. The BIM simulates the indoor environment, which includes the actual structure being constructed, and the GIS helps in modelling the outdoor environment, which includes the existing structures, temporary facilitates, topography of the site, etc.; thus, this study incorporates the knowledge of BIM in a geospatial environment to obtain optimized equipment spaces for various activities. Space in construction projects is to be considered as a resource as well as a constraint, which is to be modelled and planned according to the requirements. The integration of BIM and GIS for equipment space planning will enable precise identification of the errors in the equipment spaces defined and also result in fewer errors as possible. The integration has also eased the process of assigning the topology rules and validating the same, which otherwise is a tedious process. The workspace for each activity will include the space of the equipment. But, in most of the previous works of workspace planning, only the labour space is considered, and the conflicts and congestions occurring due to the equipment were neglected. The planning of equipment spaces cannot be done based only on the indoor environment; it has to be carried out by considering the surroundings and topography of the site, which have not been researched extensively despite its importance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: workspace; indoor environments; construction equipment; thermal power plants; automation; geographic information systems; construction sites; building management systems; remote sensing
Index terms: topography, construction activity, integration, construction equipment, thermal power plant, building information modelling, remote sensing, indoor environment, workspace, India, building management system, case study, geographic information system, modelling, construction site, automation, equipment space, topology, construction project
Subjects: energy systems, analytical methods, environmental science, production management, organizational analysis, geographical techniques and analysis, physical geography and landforms, automation and robotics, research products and data, information systems, construction equipment, data collection methods, Geography, work location, geometry and topology, mechanical systems, construction operations, management
Topics: Geographical Context, Project Management, Site Management, Plant and Equipment, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here