Jian, I Y; Chan, E H W and Yao, T Y P (2021) ICT as a solution for the revitalization of public open space in private developments. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(3), pp. 440-453. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
POSPD, as supplementation of public open spaces (POS), has become a common policy to moderate the intensification of urbanization. However, some access restrictions, both physical and information-wise, were deliberately designed by private developers to reserve the POSPD for their own gains, which further hampers POSPD's publicness and leads to their failure to bear social responsibilities. By analyzing the current situation of the availability of public open space in private developments (POSPD) from the perspective of information justice, this research aims at proposing a policy framework for an "accessible and interactive platform" which advocates promoting informational justice by integrating public participation into the establishment of an interaction loop to promote the revitalization of POSPD. The methodology includes the review of previous solutions and platforms, the establishment of a POSPD database and geographic information system (GIS) analysis. The POSPD in Hong Kong are unevenly distributed physically while the information about them is injustice and inadequate. Understanding the existing informational injustice associated with POSPD and revitalizing the stock spaces is timely and vital. Using the user-generated data from volunteers as the information flow, the proposed responsive POSPD platform will provide continuous positive feedback for policy improvement to help realize the collaborative management and sustainable development of the POS. Making use of information and communication technology (ICT) to extend the "public" to the "internet-based", the proposed framework regards the exploitation of ICT to enhance information justice as a novel way to revitalize POSPD. It involves collaborative operation among citizen participation and official POS management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | open space; smart governance; collaborative management; informational justice; equity; urbanization; geographic information systems; smart cities; failure analysis; remote sensing; New York; Hong Kong; USA |
| Index terms: | remote sensing, open space, informational justice, methodology, citizen participation, supplementation, failure analysis, geographic information system, public participation, social responsibility, internet, interaction, platform, information and communication technology, public open space, urbanization, Hong Kong, smart governance, justice, information flow, exploitation, collaborative management, database, New York, smart city, volunteer, sustainable development |
| Subjects: | computing systems, practitioner, urban sustainability, business, legal systems, participation process, research products and data, urban planning, urban design, digital design, Geography, health safety and environment, research methods, public and environmental health, diagnostic methods, management, behavioral psychology, information systems, geographical techniques and analysis, data management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here